D-Star, DMR, and Fusion. Which is right for you?

D-star, DMR, Fusion, Which is right for you? Updated version


I created the first version of this post back in early 2016, it has been almost exactly 2 years.  Let me just say things have really changed since I wrote that initial blog post.  Not only has the technology changed / advanced, so have my personal preferences.  The blog post below is updated with all of the changes that have happened over the past 2 years.


If you are an amateur radio operator and have not been living under a rock, then I am sure you have heard of one of the digital modes: D-Star, DMR or Fusion.  You may be wanting to dip your toes into the digital modes water but not sure which pool to dip them in.  This blog post is intended to present a fair unbiased opinion on each of the modes.

Not until the end will you learn my preferred mode.  I use all of the modes I will discuss.  There are additional digital modes like P25, and Nexedge that I have not used and are also much less prevalent that I will not discuss.  I do not have enough knowledge of those modes to represent them.

Also, I want to make sure up front that this is not intended to bash any one mode.  I like all forms of technology and really do not like the people that are so biased toward one that every other mode is bad.  Each of these modes has a place and my goal is to help you decide which one fits you the best.

I am going to start off with a quick synopsis of each of the modes we are going to discuss then we will get into the comparison.


Of the 3 modes we are going to discuss, D-Star is the oldest.  It was created by the Japan Amateur Radio League (JARL) and is an open standard.  It is important to note that is was created for Amateur Radio.  Most people relate Icom with D-star as they have been the primary manufacturer of D-Star equipment, however, they are just a manufacturer that has implemented this open standard into their products.  There are other manufactures that make add-on boards for D-star and Kenwood now makes a D-star handheld radio that is triband.  There is also a lot of other solutions for getting on D-Star that do not require a radio or local repeater.  We will discuss these later.


Digital Mobile Radio is known as DMR and sometimes you will hear it referred to as MOTOTRBO.  MOTOTRBO is the motorola implementation of the DMR protocol.  DMR originated as a business communication standard in Europe.  It is important to note that it was created for commercial communications, this will help to explain some of it’s features.  There are many manufactures of radios for DMR and they vary greatly in price.

DMR-Marc was the first DMR network for amateur radio and is a very popular network still.  There is a newer network called Brandmeister.  The 2 different networks work completely different from each other.  The DMR-Marc network is centrally controlled where the Brandmeister is more flexible and open.

DMR is the fasted growing digital mode, mostly because the radios for DMR are cost effective.  The other mode radios start at around $300 and go up.  You can get a DMR handheld radio for under $90 delivered.

System Fusion

Mostly referred to as Fusion is the newest digital radio mode.  It was designed by Yaesu and is not an open standard.  Yaesu is the only manufacturer of radios for this mode.  Yaesu repeaters are true multi-mode capable and can replace an existing analog repeater while still providing digital capabilities.  It can also transcode an incoming digital signal to analog or an incoming analog to digital or it can transmit what it receives, no matter if it is digital or analog.

Yaesu offered a special price to radio clubs and groups.  You could get the repeater for $500.  Clubs with old repeaters and looking toward digital saw that as a great time to update their repeaters.  Because of that there are lots of System Fusion repeaters around.  But most of them still only have FM analog users on them.

The following is a comparison chart of features of each mode then after the chart I discuss each feature listed and go into more detail on each mode.


Feature / Item D-Star DMR-Marc / Brandmeister Fusion Wires-X
Ease Of Use Easy Easy Easy
Ease Of Programming Easy More Difficult Easy
Cost $299 – $899 *$79 – $199 $299 – $700
Flexability High Low/High High
Survivability High Low/Medium Low
Extendability High Low/Medium Low
Multiple Manufacures Few Lots One
Access The Network via “Non Radio” Yes No / Yes No
Multi-band Radios Available Yes Yes Yes
Field Progammable Yes Some Yes
Connectability Yes Yes Yes
Voice Quality Good Great Great
Digital ID Yes No Yes
GPS Yes ** No Yes
Can Send Data Yes ** No Yes
Bandwidth 6.25 12.5 12.5 / 6.25
Concurrent Voice Channels 1 2 1
Error Correction Good Great Great
Mixed Mode Repeaters No With Limitations Yes
Ease of Multi-User Good Poor Good

* There are many radios that cost up to $1200 but are typically only used for commercial radio services.  These radios can be programmed to work just fine but are not common for amateur radio.

** There are a lot of radios that support this feature but because the protocol does not have a callsign within the data it does not meet the FCC requirements for ID which means it is illegal to send GPS data or regular data packets.

Now lets go through each of the features and talk about each of the modes and why I rated them the way I did.

Ease Of Use

All of these modes are easy to use.  They are different than analog so it takes some getting used to but none of them are difficult to use.  If I had to pick the one that is easiest to use, it would be DMR.  As we will discuss in more detail below, DMR is not as flexible and therefore, it is easier to use and more structured.

Ease Of Programming

It is a bit of a mixed bag in this category.  D-star is not hard to program, however, there is a new concept that you have to understand first and that is routing.  With D-star you can talk to your local repeater, another repeater, a reflector which can have 10 or hundreds of repeaters connected to it or even an individual person.  This sound complex and complicated but once you understand that your gateway is attached to the repeater you are talking to, it is very simple.

I put DMR into the more difficult category because depending on the radio you have depends on how difficult it is to program.  The concepts initially sound simple but it is complex to implement.  You have to know what each repeater is carrying as far as talk groups and on which timeslot, etc.  The other thing is, some of the commercial radios that do DMR like Motorola require some very expensive software to program them ($180 for 3 years) unless you have a friend that has it and is willing to program it for you.  Once you understand the concept of DMR it is not hard to program, just takes a lot more work.

For Fusion, programming is not much more difficult than an analog repeater, because by itself System Fusion has no connect-ability and it is nothing more than a repeater.  If your repeater has Wires-X installed it is a little more complicated but for just the radio portion, it is just as simple as analog.


Again, this is a bit of a mixed bag and even within each mode.  For D-star, the primary manufacturer has been Icom, there are other manufactures like Kenwood that manufacture a handheld D-star triband radio.  There are also other manfucatures of add on boards for other radios.  The Icom gear I would say is in the medium to high range.  However, for around $100 you can get a USB based device that you plug into your computer and you are on the D-Star network and can talk with your computer to any repeater, reflector, etc.

An entry level handheld for D-star is around $300.

The cost of DMR radios vary greatly, there are many manufactures of radios for DMR.  You can get a Tytera radio for less than $100 or go up to a Motorola radio that is above $500 approaching $1000.

With Yaesu being the only manufacturer of radios for System Fusion, you are limited.  The entry level handheld radio for System Fusion is around $300.


This is a category where I may get some flack, I rated both D-star and System Fusion high and DMR mixed between low and high.  I will explain my reasoning behind this.  On D-star, if I want to listen to a specific reflector or connect to a repeater anywhere in the world I can do that through my local repeater, my hotspot (more on this later), devices connected to my computer, etc.  If I am using my local repeater, I do not have to have the repeater owner do anything.

System Fusion works similarly if there is a Wires-X node attached to the repeater.  There is nothing required of the repeater operator and you can go anywhere at any time.

DMR-Marc has no flexibility.  The repeater operator decides what talk groups he wants to allow, which ones are pinned up (always on) and on what timeslot.  He tells the C-bridge operator what he wants and that is what you get.  If you have a friend that is on a different talk group, to bad, so sad you cannot go to it.  What is available is fixed and not flexible at all.

Brandmeister has the flexibility, there are things the repeater operator can do to limit what talk groups are on the repeater but in most cases you can kerchunk any Brandmeister talkgroup and be able to listen to it on the repeater until it times out due to lack of activity.

You have to remember that DMR was created for commercial use where they do not want the flexibility.  They want the user to not have to think about anything, pick your channel and use it.  This is the model that for the most part DMR-Marc follows.  Although, there is some cross network connections being created.  So all this could change again in the next 2 years.


When I talk survivability I am referring to in the event network issues or natural disaster occur.  Each mode works very differently and each have it’s pro’s and cons.

Just to note, every mode can survive on it’s own as a local repeater.

D-star uses regular internet DNS to connect it’s nodes.  If one node goes down, it does not affect your ability to connect to another one.  Of the 3 Modes, this is the most survivable mode, there is no reliance on a central control system.

DMR-Marc requires it be connected to a C-bridge.  I think some explanation is required here.  Unlike the Fusion and D-Star repeaters, DMR-Marc requires a central controller called a C-bridge to function.  Think of it like the dumb terminals of old mainframes that displayed the data and took input but sent it all back to the main computer to process.

The problem is if the C-bridge becomes unavailable the repeater can only work locally, it can’t go around the C-bridge to other repeaters that are still working.  So as an example, if your repeater is connected to a C-bridge in Boston along with 100 other repeaters up and down the east cost, if something happens, natural disaster, terror action or someone accidentally cuts the cable to the data center, 100 of the east coast DMR repeaters just went offline as a network until that is fixed.

Because of the dependency on the central control, I rated DMR-Marc as a low.

Now, Brandmeister does not use a C-bridge architecture.  However, there are master servers spread around the globe that a repeater connects to.  In the configuration of a Brandmeister repeater you enter a primary and a secondary server.  So if the primary goes down, the repeater should keep working.  If both primary and secondary go down then the repeater is in standalone mode.

I rated System Fusion as a low also, I know I just said it has more logic, what gives right?  Well, there are 2 servers, one in Tokyo Japan and one in Florida that are the directory servers for Wires-X.  When the node software starts up, it looks to these directory servers to pull down all of the nodes and rooms that are available.  Without these lists the node does not know how to connect to another node or room.

Wires-X itself is a peer-to-peer communication and does not rely on the central servers to transfer voice data around.  If the central servers would go down after the node has downloaded the directories, it would not affect the node until the node restarted or wanted to download a list of updates nodes/rooms.


So I need to explain what I mean by extendability.  What I mean by extendability is anything beyond a radio to repeater.  What other options are there to extend access to the network.

For all 3 modes, there is a device called a DV4Mini (US SellerGerman Seller) that allows you to access the network for D-Star, DMR and System Fusion plus a couple of others.  To use this you must have a radio that can operate in the UHF range for the mode you want to use.  So you must have a D-star, Fusion or DMR radio in addition to the DV4Mini.  There is also a DV4MiniAMBE that will allow you to use just a headset and microphone on your computer and not a radio.

Since my original post in 2016 there have been many different devices that have been created to allow the digital modes to be accessed without a local repeater.  Here is a short list of the popular ones: Bluestack, Openspot, Pi-Star with a number of different radio boards and there are more!

So why rate DMR-Marc and Fusion low?

DMR-Marc is still for the most part a closed network.  This in turn helps to create a more reliable network.  As of this time, with the exception of a few talkgroups that are linked to other networks, there is no way into or out of the DMR-Marc network except via a repeater.  With Fusion, yeah you can talk digital but no Wires-X.  Also, in both modes, you cannot easily change talk groups or rooms from RF, you have to change it in the software.

Now with D-star and Brandmesiter, there are tons of different ways to get on the network and it seems like there are new ones coming out every week.  The DV4Mini will work but you can also get DVAP‘s, DVMega boards that you connect to a Raspberry pi and have your own mini hotspot.  For D-star there are USB dongles like the Star*DV that plug in via USB and you can connect up a Icom Microphone and use it just like a radio over the internet from anywhere.

If you want to do more of the computer thing with a headset there are a number of USB dongles like the ThumbDVDVDongle, and there are many many more.  If you wanted to create your own repeater or high powered hotspot, free software on a raspberry pi and a low cost GMSK modem and one or two radios that have the din data plug in the back you are up and working.  I have a 20 watt hotspot that I can reach for miles around, a battery powered portable hotspot I plug into my lighter in my car to charge.  Using a wireless hotspot from my cell carrier, I have d-star and Brandmeister anywhere I go as long as there is cell service or a repeater.

If you are an experimenter, then of the 3 modes, D-Star is the way to go.

Multiple Manufactures

Of all of the modes, DMR has the most manufactures of radios at current.  Because of the large number of manufacturers you have a wide range of prices as well.  The low end Chinese radios come in below $100 but the high end and very reliable ones like Motorola still up close to the $1000 Range if purchased new.

Icom is by far the main manufacturer for D-Star, if it was not for them it would be more like D-what?  Kenwood now makes a triband handled that has D-star built in.  Other manufacturers have cards you can install to make them D-star capable but none are nearly as popular as the Icom radios.

As mentioned before Yaesu is the only manufacturer for System Fusion.

Access The Network via “Non Radio”

This goes along with the extendability above.  At current D-Star and Brandmeister are the only modes that have the ability to connect to it without a radio involved.

Multi-Band Radios Available

Since my first post in 2016 things have changed in this category.  In 2016 this category was an oddity to me.  Both D-star and System Fusion have radios that work on both VHF and UHF.  However, DMR did not.  So if you live in an area where you have both VHF and UHF repeaters you need to buy 2 different radios if you want to work both bands.

Why was this?  I do not have an official answer but it would make sense if the radio is for business use, your repeater is only going to be on one band so why pay for a radio that can support more than one band?  This can become a challenge depending on where you live.  However, more than 90% of DMR repeaters are UHF.  But there are still some VHF repeaters out there.  Some organizations have good reason to stick with VHF, but it is not the norm.  So if you live in one of those areas where you have both, you will need to buy 2 radios and label one VHF and one UHF.

Since 2016, multiple manufactures are now making dual band DMR radios.  However be sure to do your research on the radios before purchasing something.  I am not going to mention any brands or models because the posts live here for a long time.  But as of this writing, some of the dual band radios are having problems.  Also, a trackball is not a good user interface solution for a radio.  Just Sayin….

Field Programmable

The D-Star and Fusion radios are all field programmable.  For DMR it is a bit of a tossup.  Some of the new DMR radios allow you to program them from they keyboard, the ones that do come by default not allowing you to program them, you have to use the PC programming software to turn on that feature.

Other DMR radios do not have the option to field program them at all.  So why is this….  It goes back to it being designed for commercial business use.  You would not want your bus driver being able to change the programming in the radio.  You want to control how the radio is configured so everything is standard, etc.


All of the modes have the ability to connect to anywhere in the world if they are attached to the internet.  Each mode does it differently but there is a big difference between D-Star and Fusion compared to DMR.  It is like a push pull model.  In D-Star and Fusion, you tell the repeater or other device you are connected to what you want to connect to and it goes and does that.  Both of these modes can connect to anywhere and anything.  You find a new repeater was put in timbuctu and you can connect to it.

In DMR-Marc, it is pushed to you, you cannot do a link request, you can listen to what talk groups are setup for your repeater.  To get a new talk group added you have to talk with the repeater operator and get him to ask the C-Bridge owner to add a new talk group, assuming the repeater operator wants to do that.

Brandmeister for the most part has changed this.  In Brandmeister you can specify what talk groups you want permanently linked to a repeater.  Unless setup otherwise, anyone can kerchunk a talk group and it will be made active on the repeater until it reaches the inactivity timeout.  So there is no need to talk to the repeater owner or a c-bridge operator.

Voice Quality

In this category, DMR and Fusion have excellent voice quality.  It is noticeable especially when you go from analog to either of these modes.  D-Star has good audio, much better than analog, but sounds a bit mechanical.

Digital ID

D-Star and Fusion both send your callsign in digital format every time you key up the Mic.  According to the FCC this qualifies as an ID.  So technically you do not have to voice ID on either D-Star or System Fusion.   However, it is still good to keep in practice for when you are back on analog.

DMR sends a radio id and your subscriber ID (CCS7 ID) in data, not your Callsign.  This does not meet the FCC ID requirement so you must still voice ID when using DMR.

User Data

On D-Star and Fusion, when you hear a contact, there is a header that your radio receives that has details about the user that is connecting.  From that you can see the name of the person, their call sign, a short message and if they have GPS enabled, you can even see direction and distance information.

With DMR, their subscriber ID is what you get, to see who is calling you would have to enter into your contacts everyone you know, otherwise there is no user information available.

There are custom versions of firmware available for some radios that will allow you to upload the entire CCS7 user database to your radio so you can see who you are talking to.  Some of the new radios also come with enough memory to upload the entire database to the radio and they will show you who you are talking to.


There are radios available for all modes that can provide GPS data.  However, since DMR does not meet the ID requirement that are required, it is illegal to send the GPS data when using the radio under Part 97 Rules.

In both D-Star and System Fusion, the GPS data is used to display the direction and distance between 2 contacts.  In addition, in D-star you can click on the orange link in the dashboard and view it on a map.  Also, the GPS data in D-star that they call DPRS is transmitted to APRS.  So if your D-star radio has GPS and is enabled, you can look on sites like aprs.fi to see your location reported.

Can Send Data

All of the modes have some form of data available.  In D-star you can send up to 9600 Kbs data.  It is just data not formatted messages, etc.  In DMR you can send text messages.  In fusion you can send formatted messages, pictures, etc.

It would seem more thought was put into System Fusion as far as using the data features without connecting it to a computer to generate formatted data.


Each mode uses the bandwidth differently.  However they are all narrow band compliant.  Not yet a requirement under Part 97 Rules but it could become a possibility.  D-Star uses 6.25 Khz of bandwidth that is 9600 Kbs separated into 2  data channels, one for low speed data and one for the voice data.

DMR uses 12.5 Khz that is split in half, one for time slot one and one time slot two.

System Fusion uses either 6.25 or 12.5 Khz.  In regular voice mode, 6.25 Khz is used.  If you are sending data and talking or are using the mode called voice wide then you are using 12.5 Khz

Concurrent Voice Channels

DMR is the only mode that can support more than one voice channel at a time.  It can support 2 different voice channels in the same 12.5 Khz bandwidth.  DMR refers to these as Timeslot 1 and Timeslot 2.

Error Correction

All of these modes have Forward Error Correction (FEC) but not all of them are created equal.  From my experience DMR has the best and can recover from bit errors quickly making for a great sound.  Fusion is a close second with great sound, especially in Voice Wide mode.  D-Star trails behind them, If you are on the fringe and get some packet loss D-Star like the other modes puts out something unintelligible (called by Many R2D2).  However, D-Star takes longer to recover when that happens than the other modes.

Mixed Mode Repeaters

D-Star does not support mixed mode at all.  It is digital all the time.  DMR and System Fusion both do but not equally.

DMR can run in mixed mode but when you setup to support both analog and digital you lose the networking ability that makes these digital modes so compelling.

System Fusion was designed to support mixed mode.  Their plan is to replace aging analog repeaters with one that can do both analog and digital in the hopes that people would start using digital because it was there.  Because of that, their handling of mixed modes is great.  There are lots of options around how the repeater handles it and there is transcoding from one to the other, etc.

Ease of Multi-User

I wanted to add this to the end because this is one thing that really bothers me.  On both D-Star and System Fusion, when you ask the repeater to connect to a different location, anyone that is listening on that repeater hears that you are there and can tell you have moved the repeater.  If they want to move it, it is proper etiquette to ask if the channel is in use and if not go ahead and link it somewhere else.

In DMR-Marc this is not the case.  DMR-Marc uses talk groups and the repeater operator specifies which talk groups are on which timeslot and which ones are connected full time or (pinned up).  On your DMR radio you select what talk group you want to listen to.  However, say you want to listen to North America and that talk group is not pinned up all the time, you have to tell the repeater by keying down on that talk group.

The C-Bridge then will stop sending the current talk group to the repeater and start sending North America.  It will keep sending North America until either there is no activity from the repeater on that talk group (you do not key down for a period of time) or someone requests a new talk group.

So you are listening and having a QSO on North America and suddenly it is like the person you were talking just stopped talking.  So while you are having a QSO on North America, I key down on TAC310 to talk to my friend.  I unknowingly just took over the repeater, disconnected you from North America and told the C-bridge that the active talk group is now TAC310.

You do not know what happened and I do not know that it happened.  I have had this happen to me a couple of times.  If the repeater is not busy and with lots of people then the likelihood is lower but in large metropolitan areas the repeaters are busy and it happens.

With DMR, you have to setup a scan so that you can scan all of the possible talk groups on the repeater, but if you do not like one of the talk groups because it it too busy, etc and do not scan it, the likelihood continues.

Now What?

I just went down a long list good and bad things about each mode.  There is not one that stands out above the other, they are all legitimate modes, you have to decide what is right for you.

I assume if you read this far you are likely one of 2 people.  An amateur radio operator that is investigating the digital modes or maybe a club or repeater organization considering putting up a new digital repeater or replacing an existing one with a digital mode.  I will break this down into some things to think about for each

Amateur Radio Operator

The first thing you should do is go to repeaterbook.com and check to see what types of digital repeaters are around you.  More than likely you would want to pick a mode that you can use in your area.  You may live in an area that has all of the modes available or may live in an area that has none.

If you live in an area that has none, then your only option for DMR or Fusion is to look at the DV4Mini.  For D-Star the DV4Mini is still an option but if you do not want to spend the money on a radio and the DV4Mini, look into some of the USB dongles.  If you do not want to dedicate a computer to the job, you could look at putting a DVMega board on the $35 raspberry pi and then you can walk around your house with an HT talking all over the world.

If you live in an area with all of the modes, you have a harder decision to make.  If you like flexibility,extendability and/or love to experiment, shy away from DMR and for experimenter, get closer to D-Star.

If you want to be able to just turn it on and not have anything confusing (after it is setup) look at DMR.  DMR radios have 2 knobs, volume and typically a 16 channel knob.  You pick the talk group from the channel knob and that is it.

Club or Repeater Group

From a Club or Repeater Group you have to first think about it’s purpose.  Is it mainly for the club members to Ragchew and talk to people around the world or are you looking at more as a communication system when SHTF.  If you are looking more towards an emergency communication system then I would look at DMR.  It is much more controllable.  You can setup talk groups for the different agencies and groups.  If you are going to have more than one, I would setup your own C-Bridge on your network so that if there is some kind of natural disaster your repeaters remain connected but when all is good you can still enjoy the communication to the outside world.

If you do decide to go DMR, the question is do you go UHF or VHF.  The biggest reason I have seen for people going VHF is because the repeater group or club already have a VHF repeater and by sticking to the same band, the DMR radio can be setup for analog and still use the repeaters in the same band.

Also, really think out your talk group layout.  You can put talk groups on either timeslot.  It might be that you put a local (across your repeater system) talk group pinned up on time slot 1 and on time slot 2 you use for things like TAC310, etc.

In DMR, the etiquette is, you make contact on the larger talk groups like US Nationwide but for an extended QSO you move to a Talk Around Channel (TAC) so that the US Nationwide is free.  This can be the same etiquette you apply to your own talk group for your organization.

Ok, so you are wanting it more ragchew, fun and experimentation….

Is it going to replace and existing repeater?  If so, how busy is the repeater?  If you have regular users, how are they gonna feel if you replace it with a repeater that only does digital?  Keep that in mind.  At the same time, adoption of digital is slower if you give them the option of using both analog and digital on the same repeater.

Does the repeater site have internet connectivity?  If not, there really is only one option of the 3 modes that will get you connected to the world without internet.  That is System Fusion.  The Wires-X box that connects to the internet does not have to be directly connected to the repeater.  For D-Star and DMR, you have to have an internet connection at the repeater.

Assuming you have internet, is the main purpose so you can connect outside your area and connect to groups of other repeaters?  If so, D-Star is the way to go.  It is the best connected, most resilient Mode of the 3 and it is also the most flexible.  Brandmeister is 2nd because it is a more open network that is growing not only in the number of users but in the number and types of connections.  Fusion is a distant 3rd with DMR-Marc after it.  I only say that DMR-Marc follows Fusion because it is not flexible but fixed in what it provides.  Meaning you cannot decide to connect to Germany today, Australia tomorrow, etc unless the repeater has talk groups already present for them.

There are lots of things to think about and much of it is confusing at first.

The Future?

You can never predict the future, especially when it comes to technology.  My best guess would be that Fusion is going to struggle and may go the way of BetaMax.  D-Star is not growing as quickly as it was.  DMR is the fastest growing digital radio technology and I do not see that stopping anytime soon.  It seems the DMR-Marc people are hardcore and are a lot of professional radio people that like the Motorola hardware.

I do not want to predict a winner of the modes as I hope there is not a single winner.  Each mode resonates with each person differently.  And it also depends on what is available to you, where your friends hang out, etc.


I said in the beginning that not until the end will you know my preferred mode.  If I did an objective view in this blog post you should still not know….

My goto when not analog is evenly split between D-Star and DMR.  I have a D-Star, Fusion and DMR radio in my car, and I have at least 2 handhelds for each mode as well.  I use all of the modes.  When at home I have a house based Pi-star hotspot, a portable Pi-star hotspot with battery, charger and cellular modem, a 20 watt D-Star hotspot and 2 openspot devices.  So I give all modes equal time.  I sit here at my desk with a HH for each mode right here.

Most of my friends are on D-star, in fact we get on D-star to talk about DMR.  Not because DMR is bad, it is awesome.

One more thing…  In a SHTF situation, the goto should always be analog.  Make sure you keep a great analog repeater around for those situations.

Updated: June 3, 2018 — 23:35


Add a Comment
  1. Hello Mike, name this side is Ian, callsign is MM3TWA and am located over here on the West Coast of Scotland. Came across the The Mesa Amateur Radio Club web page while doing some research for info on the D-Star / DMR / and Fusion digital modes. I read, and liked your article ( which is right for you ) very much, as i am a bit of a newbie when it comes to these modes. I have used the Echolink mode for years now, and have very recently now been using the ” Peanut ” application, first on my phone, and now on my computer as David – PA7LIM has written and made a new version of Peanut app available to download to work on the windows platform. The peanut app seems to be aliened to the D-star mode, and it’s a mode i like very much as i like the interface it uses, as it’s very informative with both callsign and users name. So would say I’m leaning very much towards the D-star medium here then. But i would like to hear your thoughts on the ” ThumbDV Dongles ” and if you think they are a good option and do they work well. I like the idea that you get the option of getting onto the D-star and DMR networks ( and possibly the Fusion mode as well ) without the need of any kind of radio. The reason i am thinking of going with the ThumbDV Dongle is purely down to funds Mike, i had a look about some of the company’s that sell these digital radios for these modes, and find them way to expensive and certainly to deep for my pocket at the moment. Hopefully in time these radios might come down in price ( not holding my breath tho lol ) Looking forward to hearing your thoughts ( first chance you get ) on this issue then Mike.

    1. This article was pulled from another source, hence the reason we made sure that the author got credit. Mike doesn’t belong to this club, but it was found on public domain. Which is also the reason the title is a hot link to the actual article.

  2. Some comments are incorrect. Fusion radio. Ft-70 is 139.00 so your cost is off. You can access the fusion network on radio. I do it all the time with my Thumb DV, my DV megacast, DV4 mini and my DV4 home. Also fusion is growing. It’s still fairly new but since Yaesu also creates PDN software you can now connect to wires X without an additional slave radio.

    1. At the time the person who wrote it, the FT70 more than likely wasn’t on the market just yet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.